Thank you very much for the question.
That is exactly what we are saying. Indeed, when the legislation has an impact on foreign investment, the government and investors are not the only ones who need to be consulted; the community, workers and retirees also need to have the right to participate in discussions.
Although the agreement between the investor and the government was made public, that does not mean that all the information provided to the government also needs to be released, be it for White Birch Paper or even Rio Tinto.
For instance, when Rio Tinto forced a six-month lockout on our members at the Alma plant in Quebec, just after buying Alcan—another fairly similar situation—it would have been desirable to know what the agreement between the investor and the government entailed.
At the end of the day, if a multinational does not do what it said it would do, there should be a remedy for workers and the community. Multinationals should make investments as agreed. That is what we are calling for. We believe that this is not only in the best interests of the government and investors, but to a greater extent in the best interests of the community as well.