The concern would arise when you have something that is legally made or licensed in one jurisdiction and someone tries to license a similar or the same product in multiple places.
We had a major Supreme Court of Canada case at one time, believe it or not, over chocolate, which was licensed for sale in Europe, and then similar chocolate, namely Toblerone, was licensed for sale here.
These are perfectly legitimate goods, except that the rights holder may have assigned the rights to sell that product in Canada to a different person from the one who may be selling it, let's say, in Europe.
When these same products come across the border, they are legitimate products and can in fact have the effect of reducing consumer costs, and so we come close to what the government has talked about, without having a differentiation whereby Canadians often feel that they are paying more than consumers, let's say, in the United States or elsewhere.
The danger is, we need to ensure within this legislation those kinds of imports don't get caught up, because they are not counterfeit, even though rights holders may not be particularly happy about seeing that legitimate product being sold here in Canada. It's actually good for consumers when they can engage in that, so that Canadians don't face the higher price tag that can sometimes occur.