Does anybody else want to comment on that?
It gets very complicated and difficult. Government today has one intent here, and it's to make sure that people are protected. You looked at consent. You have seven-year-olds and probably even four-year-olds with iPads and they want to keep that gas going and they'll be hitting “I accept”. They don't read it; they don't care about it. They're just accepting it and they're fully exposed in having allowed that consent.
How do we better protect the consumer? That's what I want to make sure of. You've mentioned some amendments on other ways, but I think that consent issue is a really important one when you talk about new immigrants to Canada who are not completely familiar with the English language. People are accepting; we as parliamentarians are not reading the “I accept” thoroughly, and let's be honest about it. We're all busy; it's just going to be the normal stuff. We want to make sure we're making that safer and better so the consumer and Canadians are better protected.
You seem to be more concerned with the impact it's going to have financially on businesses, which I understand as well, but we want to be able to do both.