Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm just trying to get clear in my mind this discussion about consent.
We've heard from both of you that this presents a challenge. You've said that it's a hardship, and that it costs businesses to be compliant. You've also said that it's unnecessary because the Office of the Privacy Commissioner is currently able to ensure valid consent of minors, and that industry best practices are high enough to protect minors, as well as other groups.
If it is the case that the current provisions are adequate, and if you're convinced that this change, which the commissioner says is useful, is not going to change much, why is there any additional cost associated with it? How can it possibly be a hardship if you're saying it's not doing anything?