No. What I'm referring to is an organization that has my information. There may be instances where they are disclosing it either to law enforcement or to private sector organizations.
In the law enforcement context, if it's a warrant, and post the Spencer decision, it's quite clearly now going to be a warrant, or should be a warrant.
In the private sector what this bill does is to say that we can disclose information on a voluntary basis without a court order and without any sort of court oversight.
I'm saying that, over the last number of years under PIPEDA, we've had cases where organizations have said that they want to identify who those subscribers are because they want to sue them, and there's an instance where they are conducting this investigation or have this legal process. The court examines the circumstances around whether there's an appropriate case to order that disclosure and sets limitations on the disclosures that can occur.
What Bill S-4 does is to expand the prospect of that kind of disclosure on a voluntary basis.