Given the complexity of the vocabulary used, I will answer in English if I may.
I agree with what Professor Geist has just said. The federal Privacy Commissioner has noted that there are difficulties with Bill S-4 as a result of the Spencer decision. Our commissioner in British Columbia has as well. Commissioner Denham has been calling for tightening of our legislation “without consent to cases where the disclosure is “necessary” for purposes related to an investigation or proceeding.” At the same time that the current version of Bill S-4 is taking one approach, one of the substantially similar provinces—one of the committees—is heading in the opposite direction as a result of their understanding and interpretation of the Spencer decision. As Professor Geist said, the drafters of Bill S-4 didn't have the advantage of Spencer. We do today. We know what the Supreme Court of Canada said about this. I think we have to take this into account.