It's more an issue of harmonization and, for that, there are two key factors to consider. The first is privacy protection of all Canadians. As you said, the fact that this protection varies from province to province is not a good thing. Why would British Columbians be better protected than Ontarians or Newfoundlanders? I don't think this is the approach we should adopt. I am convinced that it is your responsibility to make these acts similar overall. This concept of similarity is legislative.
Mr. Carmichael asked a question about this earlier.
As for there being different regimes—things that are not quite the same—this also deals with the compliance of organizations and companies. If companies have different requirements in different jurisdictions, having to do one thing in B.C. or Alberta or Quebec and then something else in the rest of Canada—which gets back to Ms. Lawson's comment about order-making power—they will decide that, well, we've been ordered to do something by the B.C. commissioner, so we have to comply with that or be in contempt of court. This is the good thing about the compliance agreements, but, ultimately, we need order-making power, because a company may decide that it doesn't want to do that. So we will end up in different situations.