Perhaps in distinction from the view of some of our colleagues on the panel here, my view of what was happening with the recording obligation was that it was not to provide an onerous, bureaucratic nothingness; that it was actually one of those tools of reflection for the organization, in the sense that one piece of misdirected mail is human error, five pieces of misdirected mail is human error, but maybe 20 pieces isn't, and now you're starting to require some bureaucratic attention to systems. As an educative function—because you will, of course, be recording this, however informally it has occurred, even if it's very minor—it would be helpful reflection for organizations, again not punitively, but in order to appropriately assess practices.
That recording and that taking on of the obligation to essentially note even mere, technical, small, seemingly non-risk-based disclosures again helps reflect on practice in ways that we find could be educative.