People are vulnerable by not passing it.
We have organizations, as defined in that legislation, that don't feel they have the legal ability to report situations where they themselves are identifying possibilities of abuse. In terms of public protection, I'm not sure why we would allow that to stand.
With regard to any of the comments I've read on the bill, I think they can be dealt with in regulations for the most part. Things like defining governments organizations or government institutions can be dealt with in the regulations.
I think this is an opportunity to at least take that first step, put some protections in place, and then, as in any piece of legislation, see how the actual utilization of the legislation rolls out. We could always decide on amendments in the future.