I think the clause is good because it provides greater clarity. If we are going to stay with the regime of consent, you want something that is clearer rather than more vaguely worded. My broader concern about where Bill S-4 is right now in 2015 is that we have seen that all of these ideas of consent are not actually effective. We need to see much stronger protections in other areas, in terms of regulating use and disclosure.
But I think the clearer language is a very welcome step, from my perspective.