Certainly.
We would be supportive of it going ahead, I think, for some of the reasons we outlined in our opening remarks. Maybe just to underline a couple of other points, we would also support the idea that this is taking us a step forward in terms of harmonizing with some of the provincial rules, and that's a good thing. We might ask that the committee, in its report, flag some of the concerns that were addressed here that could be taken up subsequently in regulation or given some detail on in another review later on. But we would be generally supportive of it going ahead, yes.