That's an excellent question. I believe that statutory damages are an excellent deterrent.
There was a great question before about whether we should be exempting items for personal use. We should be excluding all counterfeits in our country. Take just a simple example of a counterfeit battery that's being brought into our country. That battery, when you look at it side by side with a non-counterfeit battery, looks identical on the outside: the weight is the same, the name of the brand is the same. But when you remove the plastic shell from that battery, it doesn't have any protective fan or circuitry built into it to protect the consumer. So when that counterfeit battery gets put into a digital camera or any other electronic device, it can explode. That's the harm of counterfeiting that we're dealing with in Canada and that's what should be stopped, all counterfeits on all levels, and I think statutory damages will help address that. I think the administrative regime, which is not currently in the bill, will greatly assist and alleviate a lot of the burden on the government and the CBSA.