Mr. Chairman, I know you can't plead the fifth amendment in a place like this, but I am going to say something that may be unpopular with some of the scientific community.
I think you're asking a very interesting question. My strong feeling, and that of others, is that the disruption is going to happen at the interface of disciplines as opposed to hyper-specialization in one specific discipline in itself.
I can give you an example of where it gets interesting. The big enabler for this is not just the computational biology, as you would call it. The application of computing into the biological processes has the potential for change and understanding to be accelerated at a pace that is really quite fantastic, and the importance for us is being able to have the processes in play that allow for that kind of interaction, where the really exciting unthought-of areas can explain themselves.
I think from our point of view, we want to reinforce strong basic science in the fields that they're experts in. I think also what we need to do is challenge that community to branch out, so if you're a physicist or a chemist, to work in other disciplines. The social sciences also apply to that as well. Certainly, there are debates in the community in that regard, but I do think it's something that probably is a bit of a game-changer in its own right.