On that particular point, there have been precedents in other committees to not actually hold a subcommittee but to have it as part of the general discussion. I've seen five members there versus the 10 that we have here. I think that we should be able to handle future committee business using that approach. I would suggest that maybe we rethink it. I know that this has been there in the past, but it isn't necessarily standard.
The other point I would look at is to read through that “at least one being from the Opposition”.
I am not sure whether that was clear. Perhaps Mr. Masse would like to speak to that and whether that means the official opposition or anybody who is on the opposition side.