Maybe to take a few steps back before answering the specifics, when we assess each of the projects we receive, obviously we look at them in terms of the value for money, the projects' eligibility, and the impact these projects will have going forward. One of the things we're looking for is total project costs—the amount of funding that will be leveraged out of this—and also job creation, increasing revenues, and spillover benefits. For example, if you're talking about the manufacturing sector, we need to look at issues such as the implications for the domestic supply chain, because there can be positive spillover benefits. The degree of innovation involved is also really important. That's one thing that is top of mind for us.
As to your broader question in terms of value for money, that is obviously a top-of-mind issue for us. I referred earlier to the fact that we were created only in 2009, and we're undertaking an evaluation of various programs.
You might be interested, Mr. Chair, that two years ago, despite the fact we were only created in 2009, we released our evaluation of the community futures program to try to determine the impact of the investments made through the various CFDCs. If the committee is interested in this, we will send a copy of it to the clerk.
On top of that, we've completed an evaluation of our programming of our first five-year mandate, which will be released in the coming weeks. If there's an interest, we could also submit a copy of that to the clerk.