Sorry, I'm getting a signal from the chair that I have less than a minute, and I have a follow-up question that I want to ask. I agree with you completely that it's good that we can work together on tourism.
When the human resources committee studied this issue, in the minority report we put forward, there were a couple of things that we raised as ideas. I'd like to hear your thoughts on those.
One of them centres around this idea of the regions that are set up for determining...basically they are the employment insurance regions. One of the challenges is that they're so large, they fail to catch some of the micro economies that exist in tourism. I've pointed out to Minister Hajdu a couple of examples of that in the past.
I want to get your thoughts on that. Is there some way we might be able to target our tourism regions a little better so that we can ensure they have the ability to utilize the program in areas where maybe they need it but the broader area doesn't allow that? The second one is on your thoughts on the creation of a specific stream for tourism in the temporary foreign worker program to meet some of those seasonal challenges that exist, much like with the agriculture industry.