I think you're talking about what we call the value gap. We use this term in the digital world, particularly in music, but in other areas as well. You talked about oligarchy, individual actors who generate a lot of income by taking advantage of assets, in this case creation, belonging to others. But this wealth is not shared. It is not shared at all in the case of journalistic information—that's what I understand from what Ms. St-Onge said—and the sharing is not necessarily significant in the case of music publishing. This is why we're talking about a true sharing or a real distribution of wealth.
The witness who represented the Union étudiante du Québec talked earlier about taking from the poor to give to the poor. But I think it's a false debate. Indeed, we are talking about situations where someone specifically uses the property of others and the fact that there should be a wealth-sharing system that would involve users for the benefit of others. What surprises me is that the student, generally speaking, is a beneficiary, a user, a user of the work belonging to others.
With your permission, I will turn the floor over to Mrs. Morin.