This is somewhat related to what we say in our brief with respect to restricting the tracking tool exception. There is a distinction to be made. Some sites refer us to articles, but don't necessarily provide full access without the user paying an access fee. In addition, there are content aggregation sites, such as Google, that make money and redirect us directly to other sites. There is then no transaction or economic return between the two.
That is why, in order to settle this question, there had been the idea of introducing the right of reproduction and public communication of journalistic works. This could be administered by the Copyright Board of Canada, which could set the appropriate tariffs for this type of digital use. This would encourage a redistribution of revenues, especially advertising revenues, that are in the hands of these content aggregators, without return for those who produce the information.
Perhaps Mr. Tamaro could round out the answer.