I'll give you a concrete example. We have an agreement with YouTube in the United States where we get a certain percentage of the money they generate on ad views paid to us as the publisher of the composition that's in the video being used. That is actually generating something now. It should be generating more. Up until recently, they weren't paying anything in Canada because of one of these exceptions, and Martin can advise probably better than me on the particulars. Basically, they claimed there was no right of reproduction in a composition so they didn't have to pay this. They've come to the table, apparently, recently because they had to negotiate some other things where they basically were able to concede that point, so I believe now there are agreements in place. There was a period of five to seven years where we were receiving income for this use in the United States but we weren't in Canada.
On May 8th, 2018. See this statement in context.