One question has been brought up consistently, generally by the libraries. They would like the ability to override contracts if the reason they want to override the contracts is covered under fair use. Why can't it just be negotiated into the contracts in the first place that fair use be respected? Why do you believe the government should give you the power to override a contract? The reason we have contracts, as you know, is to be in agreement, to have stability, to be a standard. If the government introduces that you can override a contract, that lowers market standards, and it creates uncertainty, which is what the government does not want to create.
Can you maybe tell me why you can't just do that at the beginning and make a deal in the contract? Why does there have to be a government power to override?