Many of our libraries would be libraries as defined in the Copyright Act, but I think some of them would not be. For example, large law firms and small law firms have libraries. They're not able to take advantage of the library provisions in the act, because I don't think they meet the definition of not-for-profit organizations, in most cases. Again, the range of membership is very broad, from very small law firms, to middle-sized law associations or law societies, to very large law firms, to university law libraries, and the interests can really vary among them.
One thing we always bear in mind is that we have quite a positive and constructive relationship with our publishers. Again, some of our members are publishers, and many of our law faculty and lawyers across the country are authors who publish works with those publishers. We always have to bear in mind our own organization's interests. It's quite a balance.
As far as interests are concerned, was your question about how our libraries interact with copyright?