I don't know that it's necessarily a problem. I think that it's an insurance so that something like what was just described doesn't become more normative in licensing.
Right now fair dealing helps us negotiate licences that allow us to do certain things with content. We put them into our course reserve systems that are walled off so that only students can use them for a time, and I think that's a really important tool. Otherwise, if you put the educational system of a university out into the marketplace with everyone else, the costs will also rise.
The market right now, I think, is tempered a bit. Even though we're spending a great deal on licensing material, it's nothing compared with what might happen should everybody be treated the same. I think maybe that's a carve-out we would like because it would be beneficial, but I think it also is a balancing act. I think the whole thing is a balancing act that publishers and libraries try to maintain.