We're seeing I think some hopeful developments in the EU. We've seen both Germany and Spain, and to a lesser extent Italy, come forward with various protections. Now it's moving to an EU level. There's the new EU directive where they're discussing the publisher's right. It's interesting, because we've seen there that as soon as that discussion enters the public realm, as a result there's a much more collaborative approach by some of the aggregators. They do come forward, either with funding for journalism or.... I mean, we've seen particularly journalism funds in almost all the big EU countries as a result of government actions on the copyright file. To us, it really shows that once you strengthen the balance, or even threaten to strengthen the balance, it works wonders.
The U.S. is a bit more complicated. There's probably a stronger legal precedence in the U.S., whether it's through the hot news stuff and things like that, but again, the enforcement is tough, right? We're 700 across the country, and many are small members. While The Globe and Mail and Postmedia may be able to do it, and they can enforce it, a lot of those small players just don't have the capacity to do it. That's where I think the legislative model needs to be amended: to give them that power.