I can discuss the role the board plays in that context and within the industry. As you know, the publishers and the industry in general have various sources of revenues, which come from the selling of their material.
What we do is set is considered to be a relatively small part of the overall income. That is the part relating to the reproductions that some institutions, like government and schools, are making of these. What we usually do is to set a rate that is in proportion to some number of copies. That comes back as royalties that get distributed back to the various publishers and the various rights' owners.
The mandate and objective of the board is to set rates that are fair and equitable, but the objective and the mandate of the board, as per the Copyright Act, is not to ensure a certain level of revenues for all of the rights' owners. That might be where you can sometimes feel some opposition between the two.