Maybe I'll knit together some of the comments from your friend as well.
Our position is that really, we try to do three things.
First is to give consumers the access they want, when they want, in the business model they want. You might want a subscription model, you might want to download, and so on. We want to get our content to consumers.
Second, we want to help consumers understand the impact of piracy. That's the impact Stephen has so articulately described to you, but it's also the impact on consumers. Various research has been done. One in three piracy sites contains malware. We've done research on sites that Canadians access. The vast majority of these have high-risk advertisements, scams, porn, and links to sites where your privacy can be compromised. That's what we try to do to ensure that consumers are aware as well.
The third part is to address those sites and services that, as Erin said, operate on a commercial scale.
If we think of it as a pie chart, right now in Canada, or at the end of 2017, 70% of the people who were accessing pirate sites in Canada were doing so through hosting and linking sites. Only 30% of that, at the end of 2017, was P2P, peer to peer, so you can see there has been a change and a shift in the piracy models Canadians are using.
Secondly, one of the largest growing threats is Kodi boxes that have illegal access to IPTV sites and illegal IPTV streams, or illegal hosting and linking sites on the Internet.
Again, we're seeing different kinds of piracy threats, and that's part of the reason we need different tools.
The Departments of Canadian Heritage and Industry, or ISED—sorry, I'm showing my age by calling it Industry—just commissioned a study and found that 26% of Canadians either accessed an illegal stream, downloaded, or somehow looked at or used pirate sites. The majority of those—36%—were movies, and 34% of those were television shows.