I'll switch over to talk a little about innovation and IP. You mentioned that for innovation you have to own the IP, and then once you own it, you have to actually make something with it, or else you're just owning IP.
This relates to a concern that we have on two fronts: dissemination, and whether you're seeing enough of that coming out of universities; and also, I think you mentioned, Mr. Burt, priority patenting in the U.S.A. first. Do you see this as a problem or an issue?