To be fair, there are new venues for people that enable them to get their works out. I appreciate that it may be one element. I'm sure many others could be pointed out.
I'd like to go over to the Art Dealers Association. In your briefing note, you point out specifically that visual artists “are already well protected for matters of copyright under the existing Act”. I'm not going to read the whole thing. You also say, “For example, while a musician is paid a royalty for each performance or broadcast, an architect is not remunerated on the resale of a home. The resale of a unique artwork is not a transfer of copyright, but a transfer of ownership.”
What are you saying here? Are you saying this is not a copyright issue?