Thank you.
I do want to come back to your comments, Mr. de Beer. I'm still struggling to understand why, regardless of whether it's five years or it's 10 years in terms of the mandatory review.... I believe that what we're trying to accomplish as a committee is to look at the long view. We're trying to project what we don't know is essentially determined in copyright. There's so much in terms of technology in the last five years. Things like Twitter and social media weren't to the extent they are today.
I've always supported the five-year review, but your raising it has me a little confused and questioning it somewhat. To reconcile the new technology piece with not doing a review at all, help me out a little.
Mr. Knopf, maybe since you hold the same position, you could also comment on this.