Okay, that's great.
I think that's where we get to the two-for-one strategy and stuff like that. It's just let's get at her and see, because you get to the point where it's too complicated and you get nothing done.
The Canadian chief economists made a presentation complaining about the fact there were government programs, but there was no longer government staff to do those programs and they were always talking about reducing the public service. Have you looked at what you're asking for here in your recommendations, and how that would be supported in the current public service, because there's work to be done here? When I used to work for the Association For Persons With Physical Disabilities, I could show that investing in my program lowered government costs by reducing the number of people on ODSP and other types of disability support, the Canada pension plan disability benefit, and so forth.
At any rate, do you feel that if there were an injection into that we could reduce costs? I'll leave that to you to finish.