Let's talk about that then. I will give you an example. You remember that in China 10 years ago they had a tainted milk scandal. A couple of people were executed. The head of their regulatory agency for food and drugs was fired. After that it got a lot harder, obviously, to get things approved in China—not easier.
That goes to the incentive of the actual regulators. We sit outside and say, why don't you be more effective? Why don't you be more efficient? When you win that balance of risk award, why don't you take a little more risk so we can have more innovation? Do you know what they say? Why? Why would I do that?
The only thing I've seen here is your concept of two-for-one that would mandate them to say, you have to do it. But in terms of saying that they want to change your attitude or your approach, why would they do that?