I would like to talk about the Canadian International Trade Tribunal process because, Mr. Galimberti, you mentioned you'd like to see further reforms to it.
I don't know if you're familiar with the case of rebar in British Columbia. This is a case where many of your members took issue with the fact that imports from China, I believe, Turkey, and Korea, were dumping. An investigation was done, a 40% tariff was put in place, the whole tribunal process, intervenors and all that, happened. However, to me at the end of the show, we don't see more Canadian rebar products being used. I don't understand why someone hasn't taken it. In fact, the United States is now selling more rebar into British Columbia. It's a bit of a perverse issue because, yes, we don't want to see dumping. On the other hand, British Columbia consumers, who have some of the highest real estate prices, are paying on average 6% more for their rebar, not to mention what this could mean for the LNG industry.
I understand your desire to tinker with the system or to see further reforms, but what do you say when someone brings those concerns to you?