Yes, and I would even put this forward. There are certain issues when we import product, and I don't think we're here to talk about those today; we're here about how we can encourage exports.
Often the role of our regulators isn't so much to change what we're doing here—although we have some of that to do—as it is to work with their colleagues internationally so that when we change a regulation or change a restriction on an ingredient, we arrange to do it at the same time in the same way. We don't want to create disruption out there.
We had a recent run-in over MI/MCI. If we are going to impose a new rule on something or have a new sunscreen warning system, can we agree at least among Europe, the United States, and Canada on what it's going to be?
Doing that would allow us to move to a common label, which means a single inventory management, all of which makes it easier to export. We export a greater percentage than anyone else does, so if we can do that, it's to our advantage. However, for our regulators, the people who sit at those tables, it's not even on the agenda. It's not often in their mindset.
There needs to be a cultural change in the way we think about regulation and about how we advance our national interests.