No worries.
It's a concern. With that answer, I'd also like to understand why there was a seven-year limitation and then a renewal, including the reasons for it, and why there was then no opportunity for review. A lot of the work is being done there. For every $1 put in there, $12 have gone back to the economy. We have partners that have basically paid almost the equivalent in private sector and philanthropic donations that equal the investment there.
I'd just be curious with the regard that, but also the overall programs that are successful. These research excellence centres are going to automatically die on the vine because of an ideological decision over a decade ago about them.
I'll leave it at that, Mr. Chair.