First of all, it was scaled back. A number of things were scaled back, including the per cent of the tax credit, but also some of the ways the calculations were done. If that were reversed, that would certainly be quite beneficial to us. That would allow us to invest even more in R and D.
There is also the administration of the program. Historically, throughout the years, it would be a pendulum. It would get tighter and it would get looser, depending on who was leading the organization and what direction was being provided. Today it's as tight as it's ever been, with basically everybody looking for ways to disqualify activities from counting for that tax credit program.
I think it should be looked at from the top. What behaviours do we want? If an activity falls into that suite, which would have to be clearly defined, then we want to be able to credit that particular aspect.