Let me take a shot at that.
Traditional OEMs can be counted, right? Whatever your number or however you define them, there are 13, 17, or 20 of them.
Take a look at the prospects of the company. Take a look at what they're making. Take a look at the regulatory environment in the target markets, like corporate average fuel economy in the U.S., and you can say, “We can triage two or three targets.” Then, take a look at those targets. You don't have to put your ear to the ground to find out who else is talking to them. Take a look at their package. Take a look at our package. Build it pro forma over 20 years, and then say, “Look, on a 20-year basis, I think Canada is more competitive than anybody else.”
But, these other jurisdictions bend that NPV, net present value, curve with the package. You started on AIF, and I've been very public about this; I think every other competing jurisdiction recognizes that we are now in a very cheap money environment. A company with a good balance sheet can borrow $1 billion at very low commercial rates.
Every other competitor says that if they're in the game—and you have to decide that you're in the game—then you're in the business of grants and/or training dollars or other contributing pieces like that.
I think it's an expectation of this industry that sooner rather than later the AIF terms get changed to reflect a competitive environment.