Thank you very much for that question. I think what needs to be done here is this. From a policy standpoint, and ultimately a regulatory standpoint, governments, whether it's this government or any other government—and the continuity, by the way, is really important in terms of certainty for future investment decisions—have to look at it through a lens of the economic realities and benefits. If we don't do that, then we're going to run up short in terms of, for instance, costs that will add to our cost of doing business here.
I don't care if you're an existing company, or whether you're a potential new candidate for investment in Canada. It all comes down to not one issue but multiple issues that are all summed up in terms of the total cost of doing business here. If we're not competitive on that basis, then we're not likely to get new investment in any major way, which is probably why we've lost out on some investment to date.
You always have to look at policy development through that lens. That doesn't mean you can't still achieve environmental objectives, or other objectives, but ultimately, if we don't do that, then we're not in the game. The real issue here, the challenge, is staying in the game relative to our competitors. From a government standpoint, any government, whoever is in power federally and provincially, needs to look at it in that context.