Okay. In my day job, I actually work for Maple Leaf Foods. On antibiotic resistance and the movement from a labelling claim standpoint, I think consumers are pushing us very aggressively to probably the right outcomes, which means that we have to responsibly use antibiotics, and I'd say, by and large, the industry does so today. The regulations that we work under within this country are some of the best. They're probably the best in the world.
Our call-out is more from a trade standpoint. This country sets our standards, and if we're going to allow imports into this country, they should still meet our standards or be produced under the same standards that we are forced to adhere to. That's the challenge. With the agreement we're pursuing with the EU, a great number of inequities exist in terms of the standards we're held to operate under—in plant, on farm, and so forth—that will actually limit our trade going into their countries, but we have been very fully accepting of all of their standards and their practices that don't meet ours, and of that meat coming into our country.
From that standpoint, what we want is just one standard. If this is the standard we need to operate under, and these are the costs we're going to have to incur or not incur, depending on the products we're all labelled to use, then the meat coming into this country should have the same requirements.
Sorry, what was your second question?