It's a really good question.
I like your idea of a mandatory review. I hadn't thought about that, but that's certainly something that's done in other contexts.
Having worked in this field for over 25 years, I would say that of course there are some cases of over-discrimination, and we've seen some horrible examples in recent weeks, which I don't need to remind you of. However, a lot of it is unintentional. The research shows that there's unconscious bias, that often people gravitate towards people who are like them. That's just the way things are, and it's part of the reason that a lot of the very powerful women's organizations have just focused on gender diversity and haven't noticed that they're in rooms that are not very diverse when you think about those other issues.
I believe that information is important, but I still think there are lots of companies that don't get it. I have a real commitment to innovation processes and everything we know about social innovation being applied to this area. Your legislation is critically important, but there are other things you're doing with work-integrated learning and by trying to attract direct foreign investment to create jobs, like GE in Welland. There are all sorts of instruments that government has right across the board to potentially incentivize this kind of behaviour, and I think that's a more productive strategy, because we risk backlash if we're too heavy-handed on this, in my view.