Thank you.
Evidence of meeting #54 for Industry, Science and Technology in the 42nd Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was security.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #54 for Industry, Science and Technology in the 42nd Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was security.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Former Chief Statistician of Canada, As an Individual
—a government in the future will be just as capable of doing what happened in 2011.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Dan Ruimy
Sorry to cut you off. We are tight on time.
We're going to move on to Mr. Baylis.
You have seven minutes.
Liberal
Frank Baylis Liberal Pierrefonds—Dollard, QC
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Fellegi, I'd like to understand. You talked about the advisory council and, to my understanding, the existing council is being cut from 40 people to 10. You think that's a drastic cut. When there were 40 people, was the council functional? What would be the right number, and what should it be doing?
Former Chief Statistician of Canada, As an Individual
There isn't a single right number, but I think that 10 goes quite far if one wants to incorporate in that statistics advisory committee or council the variety of disciplines that Statistics Canada is active in and that need to be considered in terms of priorities. Here I refer to the variety of geographical areas, the variety of client groups needed—
Former Chief Statistician of Canada, As an Individual
I was happy when it was 40.
Former Chief Statistician of Canada, As an Individual
It was working. It didn't try to vote on anything. It came to consensus, and sometimes with dissenting views, which is quite appropriate, but it provided extremely valuable advice—
Former Chief Statistician of Canada, As an Individual
—to me throughout my tenure.
Liberal
Former Chief Statistician of Canada, As an Individual
I share Dr. Fellegi's view.
It could be somewhat smaller than 40, but still, 10 is too small.
Liberal
Frank Baylis Liberal Pierrefonds—Dollard, QC
Ten is too small, so give us a number.
You've worked with the councils, so what would work for you?
Former Chief Statistician of Canada, As an Individual
The thought that comes to mind is about 20 to 24, somewhere in there.
Former Chief Statistician of Canada, As an Individual
Regional representation, sectoral representation, a wide range of views.
Liberal
Frank Baylis Liberal Pierrefonds—Dollard, QC
You called on this council in your roles. It was valuable to you in your roles.
Former Chief Statistician of Canada, As an Individual
Very much so.
They meet twice a year, and they are invaluable in ensuring that our program evolves in line with the interests of Canadians.
Former Chief Statistician of Canada, As an Individual
It also provides service in the case of a crisis. There are knowledgeable spokespersons in a variety of locations and disciplines who can actually defend, from an independent perspective, outside of Statistics Canada's perspective, when Statistics Canada needs defence. It's a very important support group.
I totally agree with the 20 to 25.
Interestingly, when you push that number—
Former Chief Statistician of Canada, As an Individual
—those are the numbers that you—
Liberal
Frank Baylis Liberal Pierrefonds—Dollard, QC
And I guess regional representation would be simply one of those factors.