I don't necessarily want to dwell on the pipeline issue.
If you're looking to extract resources in an area, for example, and it makes sense for the community and it makes sense for the company, and it's for the benefit of Canada, not everybody always agrees all the time with respect to how that should occur.
I think our aboriginal communities are good examples. We have lots of instances where companies have been prevented from operating on reserve territory or otherwise because they simply do not have the permission of the community to do so, and where the negotiations between the resource company and the community break down quite easily.
We see our role as providing that understanding that may help build the bridge between companies, or the government itself in terms of policy, and the communities that would resist that for whatever good reason they would have.
The the point is that we're not talking about legal issues. We're talking about intangibles, in a sense, that reflect or are derived from community sentiment or beliefs that may in some cases not even be valid. It's the kind of research we would do, and certainly people from the more technical side in the scientific or engineering areas could help allay those concerns, or in fact lead to whatever outcome would be best for the company and the people involved.