Lloyd just touched on it. I think it's even what Brian's saying.
The concern I have with this particular motion is it's targeting one company. What we're talking about, Brian, is we should be looking at the process, and you mentioned the same thing. My concern would not be a specific Chinese company. There's an unfair trading advantage here. They can buy 100% of our company; we cannot buy 100% of their company. I'm quite concerned about our getting into a trade agreement that says we can buy 49% of a Chinese company; we cannot own 51% of a Chinese company, but they can come in and buy any company of ours.
I'm not interested in this particular motion because it's just looking at one company, but I would agree with Lloyd and Brian, if we wanted to take a look at the unfair trade practices with China right now. If I want to go to the United Kingdom, I can buy 100% of a United Kingdom company, and they can buy 100% of our company. We may or may not like it, but we're on a fair playing field. That's not the case here. If I want to set up a manufacturing plant in China, I cannot own it 100%. I think they're going to change that for manufacturing only—I think there's talk—but if I want to own a service company or anything else, they'd block it. That discussion is something I'd be open to.