First of all, I'll echo some of Jeff's comments. I think standardization is an obvious lever, in the sense that, once you've gone through the process, you've been through the learning curve and you can do it again and again. That facilitates the industry's going back to that well of knowledge on an ongoing basis and hunting for IP.
It's not necessarily one standard policy writ large across the country, but certainly regional policies could be put in place—let's say in Ontario and Quebec—or three or four universities in a cluster can agree on a framework. Innovation and innovation commercialization are largely a regional activity that's been proven out. Having standard equity documents, standard royalty agreements....
One of the frustrations I had specifically was that the technology transfer manager felt that it was his duty to maximize the profit for his university. He negotiated extremely hard and ended up, I would argue, kind of sabotaging the deal for his own personal career growth. Having a standardized template and not trying to maximize every dollar would go a long way toward solving the problem.