I'm going to reframe my question one more time. Let me acknowledge that I understand that there is a scheduled review planned for July. I get that. I also understand that we suspended the PRA section and we combined the two.
In your statement, what you specifically said was that Canadian representatives from industry, academia, and civil society have raised concern over the scope of the PRA. As well you said, as noted in recent ISED consultation with stakeholders, there is a significant sentiment that some aspects of the law could be further clarified.
I have a two-part question. First, can you tell me what those top three concerns are? Second, can you tell me which aspect of the law you think needs further clarification? I believe those would be able to help us frame our discussion.