I'll ask everybody to respond to this.
We had a recent stay of part of the legislation for individuals. Whether you're an individual and a private citizen or you're a business owner, there was recourse.
In your opinion, what recourse is there for people? If I go out and spend my money to buy a device, some of them up to $1,000, I'm going to pay fees of $50 to $75 a month for it. It's going to affect the way I interact with my family and with my business and it can have other consequences on my privacy. It can have other consequences in terms of how I maintain contacts for emergencies, and so forth. I've chosen this as my primary communication device.
What recourse is there, then, in terms of what has been stayed? Whether you agree or disagree with the private thing, why should there be a reduction of that privilege to protect oneself in terms of the argument? Why either reduce the protections or not allow that for private citizens? What gives somebody the right to unsolicitedly use my investment, my time, and my materials, and expose me to privacy concerns without being requested to do so?
I'll start with Ms. Brown.