I think we need to understand that the existence of the private right of action under the law is not an accident. We looked at other jurisdictions which had it, and then spoke to organizations that had used it and found it was effective.
In the United States, where you see some of these actions, we spoke to organizations that had used the law, and they found that the misuse, sometimes of their domain or other sorts of spamming activities, declined after they brought those actions. That was why we brought it in.
I think we can speculate about all the potential misuses of the private right of action if it were to come into place, but with a less litigious society, typically the United States—and we've actually seen effectiveness there—from my perspective, I thought we surely should have at least seen how it worked. That's what these kinds of hearings are for—to see if it has been creating unintended consequences and if we think there is an opportunity to fix it after the fact, rather than taking away what was viewed as an important element in the tool box to try to deal with the problem.