Thank you.
Please help me with some clarification here. We heard from Desjardins at our last meeting that, overall, the provision to be able to provide safety notifications is inhibited by CASL. You at Rogers are saying a similar thing. To protect your consumers, you want to be able to give them notices of roaming, etc. And yet we'll hear from people who do in fact get those messages. Then we heard from Mr. Geist that somehow there is not an interpretation or an appropriate interpretation of CASL, and yet companies can indeed do that to help protect consumers, and yet companies are interpreting it too narrowly. Can both of you talk about that? There seems to be some incongruity here. Is it in the application, or what is it?