It would help.... For the enforcement of CASL provisions per se, we have the authorities we need to enforce the conducts prohibited by CASL. In our case, the two conducts are address harvesting and spyware. The recommendation we're making is to broaden the ability to share on other parts of our individual mandates. Here it's privacy protection, the obligation to have adequate safeguards. To have the authority to share information with the two other agencies for broader purposes would allow us to be more effective in our investigations on not the CASL conduct but the other conduct that is the subject of our acts.
I raise this in the context of this study, because the source of authority for sharing information, in our case to enforce PIPEDA more broadly, came from consequential amendments to CASL.