We're trying to the close the gap here. If there is a legitimate argument to be made on CASL, it's that it's very complicated and difficult for some businesses to be able to use electronic messaging and marketing in an effective and responsible way. They have to engage another party, a third party, for a business to do so, and then there are extra costs and so forth.
My question is, does the department—especially for tourism—in looking at small business, have the resources and the capabilities, and was the budget increased, as this was incurred over the...? This is one of the reasons I asked for the three-year review, because it's a legislative part. It's in the legislation to have that three-year review. Are there resources allocated there to help bridge the gap between those who want to comply and don't?
Again, I haven't found evidence of CASL being that credible—when we hear about the lemonade stands and stuff like that. If you're going to spend your time to come here and say that at committee, then it really says something about your other testimony, in my opinion. What I want to get to at the end of the day is what we can do to close the gap of the legitimate concerns. Does your department have the resources necessary to do so, if there's an enhanced campaign to do that?