Clarity is always helpful when it comes to communications. If I reflect back on some of the commentary you heard from some of the witnesses so far, I think you heard a balancing between the potential consumer impacts that CASL has had so far in terms of minimizing spam and some of the activities that the digital technologies have had. Also, I think you heard from some of the industry advocates around moving from less complexity to more simplicity, perhaps less prescriptive to more principles-based, and an opportunity for increasing clarity.
Again, I'm not the policy shop. When it comes to the communications pieces, it's always a challenge for us as part of our role in this because we can't give enforcement advice and we're very careful about that in our role. We have to be really careful. If a Canadian business or a consumer came to us asking if this was against CASL, we would defer them to the appropriate enforcement agency to make that determination. It's very challenging for us to be making any kinds of determinations, because we don't want to cause any confusion. The folks who make the interpretations and enforcement of the law are the actual enforcement agencies. We're really just here to help raise awareness of the whole piece.