I think the relationship is very positive. We work well with the other two agencies, the CRTC and the OPC. We know that the SRC, for example, has been a very useful tool for us in terms of a source of information for our own investigations. That's hosted by the CRTC. They have had, I believe, 40 million records and one million complaints since 2014, so that's an interesting source of information for us. We use it. We rely on it.
There are some anomalies or observations that we've recognized with respect to the SRC. The majority of the records that appear in the SRC actually fall outside of the mandate of the bureau. We also find that many of these records relate to mass-marketing fraud. Again, that's a very narrow area. Also, a lot of the records in the SRC that are not mass-marketing fraud deal with health-related products. The result of all of this is that we find that within the bureau's mandate, only 97% to 99% originate from outside of Canada and are, therefore, again beyond our jurisdiction.
The SRC has been useful to a certain extent. We have provided some guidance to the SRC and to the CRTC in terms of how the SRC can organize its information a little bit better for the benefit of the bureau's analysis.
In terms of information-sharing, we have the MOU—